🔗 Share this article

These times present a very unusual situation: the pioneering US procession of the babysitters. Their qualifications differ in their qualifications and attributes, but they all share the identical mission – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of Gaza’s delicate truce. Since the war ended, there have been few days without at least one of the former president's envoys on the scene. Just recently saw the arrival of Jared Kushner, a businessman, a senator and a political figure – all arriving to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In only a few short period it launched a wave of operations in the region after the deaths of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, according to reports, in many of Palestinian injuries. Several officials urged a restart of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament enacted a preliminary decision to take over the occupied territories. The US stance was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the American government appears more focused on maintaining the existing, uneasy stage of the ceasefire than on moving to the following: the rebuilding of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it seems the United States may have goals but little specific proposals.

For now, it remains uncertain at what point the suggested international governing body will actually assume control, and the identical applies to the proposed peacekeeping troops – or even the composition of its personnel. On Tuesday, Vance declared the United States would not impose the membership of the international force on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet keeps to refuse various proposals – as it did with the Ankara's proposal recently – what follows? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the forces supported by Israel are even prepared in the task?

The matter of the duration it will require to neutralize Hamas is equally unclear. “The aim in the administration is that the global peacekeeping unit is will now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” said the official this week. “It’s may need some time.” Trump further emphasized the lack of clarity, saying in an discussion a few days ago that there is no “hard” schedule for the group to disarm. So, in theory, the unidentified members of this not yet established international contingent could deploy to Gaza while Hamas fighters still hold power. Would they be dealing with a governing body or a militant faction? Among the many of the questions surfacing. Some might question what the outcome will be for average Palestinians under current conditions, with Hamas carrying on to focus on its own opponents and critics.

Recent events have yet again highlighted the blind spots of Israeli journalism on both sides of the Gaza border. Each outlet strives to examine every possible aspect of Hamas’s breaches of the truce. And, usually, the situation that the organization has been stalling the return of the bodies of killed Israeli captives has taken over the news.

On the other hand, attention of civilian deaths in Gaza resulting from Israeli operations has received minimal attention – or none. Take the Israeli counter actions following Sunday’s southern Gaza incident, in which two troops were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s sources claimed 44 fatalities, Israeli news commentators criticised the “limited response,” which targeted solely installations.

That is not new. Over the past weekend, the press agency accused Israel of infringing the truce with the group multiple occasions since the agreement began, resulting in the loss of dozens of individuals and injuring an additional 143. The allegation was unimportant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was merely ignored. Even reports that eleven members of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli forces recently.

Gaza’s civil defence agency reported the group had been attempting to return to their home in the a Gaza City area of the city when the vehicle they were in was attacked for reportedly going over the “yellow line” that demarcates areas under Israeli military control. That limit is invisible to the ordinary view and is visible only on charts and in official papers – not always available to average people in the area.

Even that occurrence hardly rated a note in Israeli journalism. A major outlet mentioned it in passing on its website, quoting an IDF spokesperson who said that after a suspect transport was spotted, soldiers fired alerting fire towards it, “but the transport continued to move toward the soldiers in a manner that created an direct risk to them. The soldiers engaged to neutralize the danger, in line with the truce.” No casualties were reported.

Amid this perspective, it is little wonder numerous Israelis think Hamas alone is to responsible for breaking the truce. This perception risks fuelling appeals for a tougher strategy in Gaza.

Sooner or later – perhaps sooner than expected – it will no longer be adequate for all the president’s men to play kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need